FORMAÇÃO

quinta-feira, 24 de novembro de 2022

DIA NACIONAL DO FORMADOR (18 Nov.)

DIA NACIONAL DO FORMADOR (18 Nov.)
Acesso gratuito aos vídeos dos 4 painéis do X Encontro Nacional de Formadores. Pode também fazer download de todos os documentos apresentados e analisados durante o evento.Clique Aqui
Pretende obter um certificado de participação? (6 euros) Clique Aqui

Miguel Fonseca: Formador do Ano 2022
Os participantes do X Encontro Nacional de Formadores escolheram, em direto, Miguel Fonseca, como o Formador do Ano 2022. Patrocinadores: GMS Store (iPad 10.2” Wi-Fi 64GB); Genially - Oferta de 1 Plano Master. Troféu produzido pela Designer Rita Frutuoso (ESAD Politécnico de Leiria). O Daniel Lança Perdigão (UpSideUp) registou esse momento.

O Mapa do Tesouro da Aprendizagem

1º Painel

Já disponível o vídeo do 1º Painel: "O mapa do tesouro da aprendizagem", do X Encontro Nacional de Formadores. Painel dinamizado por Mário Martins e Pedro Félix, com os Oradores Domingos Fernandes e Maria do Céu Roldão. Clique na Imagem para aceder ao vídeo. Pretende um certificado digital do evento? (6 euros) Clique Aqui

Dar uma nova forma à ação dos Formadores
2º Painel

Já disponível o vídeo do 2º Painel: "Dar uma nova forma à ação dos Formadores", do X Encontro Nacional de Formadores. Painel dinamizado por Mário Martins e Pedro Félix, com os Oradores João Leite e Manuela Rodrigues. Clique na Imagem para aceder ao vídeo.

Como Motivar para a Aprendizagem?
3º Painel
Já disponível o vídeo do 3º Painel: "Como motivar para a aprendizagem?", do X Encontro Nacional de Formadores. Painel dinamizado por Mário Martins e Inês Moura, com os Oradores: Maria Inês Rodrigues; Filipe Castro; Vera Cunha; Joaquim Sapateiro; Adelina Moura. Clique na Imagem para aceder ao vídeo.

Newsletter

Como promover a autonomia do aprendente?

4º Painel
Já disponível o vídeo do 4º Painel: "Como promover a autonomia do aprendente?", do X Encontro Nacional de Formadores. Painel dinamizado por Mário Martins e Inês Moura, com os Oradores: Micael Sousa; Manuel Oliveira; Filomena Seara; Emanuel Araújo; Miguel Fonseca. Clique na Imagem para aceder ao vídeo.

Newsletter

Patrocinadores Forma-te

domingo, 23 de janeiro de 2022

Kennet Clark Civilização

🏛🏣🏤🏫🏯🏰💒🗼🗽⛪🕌🕍⛩🕋⛲🌁🌉🎨🎭🎻🥁🎷🎺🎹📚🗞🖌🗿

https://youtu.be/b2lmlDp2WGg

🏛🏤🏯🏫🏰🗼🗽⛪🕌🕍⛩🕋🌁🌉

quarta-feira, 13 de outubro de 2021

Teaching Kids to Give and Receive Quality Peer Feedback

Building a classroom culture of feedback requires scaffolding and a safe, nurturing environment, but it’s worth the effort, teachers say.

By Paige Tutt

October 8, 2021

Jamie Kobs knows the value of giving students timely and meaningful feedback, but she often struggled with the volume of incoming assignments. Then she discovered a solution: her students. Feedback didn’t always need to come directly from her, the veteran high school English teacher realized. In fact, if she taught kids the skills to deliver constructive, focused feedback, it could be equally meaningful coming from fellow classmates.

“Besides relieving me of some of the pressure, creating a classroom culture where students give each other feedback has helped me increase engagement and build community,” Kobs says. “Having more frequent interactions among students builds rapport and trust and disrupts the idea that I’m the only expert in the room."

A high-functioning feedback culture also frees up teachers to give more low-stakes assignments, creates more opportunities for students to practice, and democratizes the creative process—replacing the top-down dynamics of more typical classrooms and making kids an equal and accountable part of learning outcomes for everyone. Kids who frequently draw, create podcasts, or write fiction with the expectation that their peers will be consuming it, and who are themselves expected to provide useful feedback, are more likely to be attuned to the elements that make art or stories truly outstanding and “feel more seen, heard, valued, and, consequently, engaged in their work,” according to Kobs.

But the middle and high school years can be a difficult time for students when it comes to peer evaluation—some initial reluctance is normal. Research shows that adolescents are hypersensitive to criticism, and when they feel judged, they can become self-conscious, stressed, or withdrawn. Other students may feel tentative or shy about giving feedback to peers they admire, and for English language learners, the process might feel especially daunting.

Developing a culture of feedback must therefore happen in tandem with creating a safe and supportive classroom. By scaffolding the feedback process in a classroom where kids feel valued and empowered—the effort requires “consistent modeling, repetition, and a commitment to sharing the feedback with students,” says Kobs—even teens can become more comfortable with the act of giving and receiving peer feedback.

Here are six considerations for creating a culture of feedback in the classroom.

Encourage reflection, not correction: Consider limiting feedback cycles to work products that are not highly structured, or that require granular feedback related to syntax, grammar, and spelling. When students in Mark Gardner’s high school English class provide feedback, he encourages them to focus on collectively reflecting, not correcting, each other’s work. Very few incoming high school students have mastered the conventions of writing well enough to be reliable copy editors, he says. Rather than correcting syntax errors, Gardner wants his students to focus on providing feedback that outlines clear next steps that peers can take toward improvement.

“My students focus on idea development, clarity, and arrangement to make sense of the writer’s text,” he explains. He asks students to write full sentences in their observations like, “I am confused about who ‘they’ are in this sentence” or “I like how you repeated keywords from your hook here in your conclusion.”

Assign feedback partners: To prevent students from worrying about evaluating friends, high school history and government teacher Benjamin Barbour recommends assigning partners instead of letting kids choose who to critique in the class. Once students are working in pairs, consider allowing them to share feedback with each other rather than with the whole class, making it a generally less stressful experience for kids.

Offer choices: Including an element of choice in the feedback process can build student agency and motivation, writes educator Dr. Catlin Tucker in her blog. A peer feedback choice board, for example, allows students to select prompts that provide direction and context for delivering feedback that’s “specific, meaningful, and kind,” Tucker notes.

For English language learners, teachers can create choice boards “with sentence frames to provide students with additional support as they give each other focused feedback,” Tucker writes. “For example, under the box labeled ‘Greatest Strength,’ teachers could rework that as a series of fill-in-the-blank statements. The strongest part of this draft was ______. I thought ______ was done well. I really liked ______.”

Deliver feedback that is specific: Emphasize the idea that criticism must be both constructive and specific in nature in order to be helpful. English language arts specialist Katherine James says that students often leave general or vague feedback like “I really enjoyed your story.”

Instead, encourage kids to be focused and specific with their feedback. “Give examples of what specific feedback sounds like—for example: I really liked your simile ‘the rain hit the pavement like arrows’ because it helped me visualize the setting,” rather than the more general ‘I liked your description,’” James says.

Specificity counts in oral feedback too, and scaffolding student responses is equally important. After Socratic seminars or academic discussions in her classroom, Kobs directs students to “give a specific example of something someone else said during this discussion that resonated with you,” and “explain why it stuck with you.”

Model feedback, and suggest sentence starters: During the brainstorming stage of a personal narrative assignment in her high school English classroom, Kobs’s students pitch ideas via Flipgrid videos. Students then watch and respond to the pitches of two classmates with the help of sentence starters.

To ensure that the feedback cycle is targeted and productive, Kobs and her colleagues “model both the pitch and the response steps with videos of our own” and provide sentence starters to help kids focus on the most important aspects of the piece and clarify how to deliver their feedback. Sentence starters might prompt students to say, “I didn’t get the part about...,” pose questions or suggestions out of curiosity like “What happened next?” or “Maybe you can try...,” or make connections: “Something similar happened to me when...”

Prompt deeper engagement: Consider trying an “I like, I wish, I wonder” framework as another way to help focus students on content rather than grammar and spelling errors. It encourages them to interact creatively with their peers’ work, says James, and encourages critical thinking as students try to provide meaningful feedback.

“When reading each other’s work and giving feedback, they must discuss one thing they liked about the other person’s work, one thing they wished that person had done differently, and one thing they wondered about (for example, how a main character felt about or reacted to an event),” she explains.

The Case Against Zeros in Grading

https://www.edutopia.org/article/case-against-zeros-grading?utm_content=linkpos1&utm_source=edu-newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=weekly-2021-10-13-A

Teachers can rethink their grading practices to make them more mathematically fair for students and allow for redemption for a missed assignment.

By Alexis Tamony

October 6, 2021

Let’s say a student fails to turn something in. What grade should they receive? I have asked this question of a lot of teachers lately, and here are the most common answers I’ve gotten: “Zero.” “Nothing.” “-5.” “An F.” “A K.” What?

I’m currently in my 19th year of teaching, and my answer to this question has evolved significantly over time. I was a staunch “Give them a zero. I don’t give points for doing nothing. You earn them.” However, in the past two years, my answer has evolved to include some nuance that I believe is more mathematically fair to students and allows for redemption.

UNDERSTAND THE GRADE BAND REALITY

I’m a math teacher and I love number lines. So what does this have to do with grades? Let’s envision a number line with the traditional 0–100 grade scale on it. Way over on the right would be the A grade band (90–100). The B band would be from 80 to 90, a C from 70 to 80, and a D from 60 to 70.

When a student receives an F, that grade band doesn’t continue with that nice equal 10-point interval from 50 to 60. When we give students a zero, that zero is in grade purgatory! If we continued the equal-interval spacing of 10 points per letter, a zero would actually be a K. I think K stands for “Kill Grade.” Let me explain.

Think about a student who does consistent B (85) work. Their first two assignments are solid 85s, so the average is an 85. If this student doesn’t turn in the third assignment and receives a zero, their grade drops to an F (57). Because of that one zero, it will take that student 14 more 85s just to get their grade back to an 80.

To be clear, a student could have 15 total 85s in the grade book and one missing assignment (traditional zero), and their grade would still be C because of the way that zero mathematically affects the grading system.

Our students know this. They get in a hole because of some missing work or some zeros and they inherently know that they may never be able to get out of it no matter what they do. They can consistently turn in good work, but their grade hardly improves because of the math behind the K (the zero).

THINK PHILOSOPHICALLY TO REDEFINE ‘0’

When I realized this, I had to philosophically understand what I wanted my grade book to be: an accurate reflection of student knowledge. I also don’t want my grading practices to be demotivating. I needed to make a change and wrap my head around “giving them something for nothing.” It seemed as wrong as the K grade. So here’s what I did: I had to reframe the concept of a zero.

If we think about grades on an equal-interval basis, each grade band is worth an equal value of 1. An F is 0, a D is 1, C is 2, B is 3, and A is 4. If we make each grade band equal, then failure isn’t disproportionately weighted. If we still have to use the 0–100 scale (which is mathematically skewed to failure), then we have to hack the traditional grade book and convert that 0–4 equal-interval scale into a 50–100 scale. Essentially, this makes 50 the new zero. We redefine the floor of our grading system to make it more mathematically accurate and less punitive. I’m not giving them something for nothing. I changed the narrative to redefine the floor at 50, so that failure isn’t worth more than success.

Let’s revisit our student who does consistent B work. The student does B-level work on two assignments and then misses one. Instead of giving that missing assignment a K (0), we give it an F (50). We use our new floor of 50 for a missing assignment. The student’s overall grade significantly drops to a 73, but it takes only four more Bs to get back into the B band. The F allows for redemption. The K doesn’t.

I spent this past summer involved in a study on Joe Feldman’s book Grading for Equity with 55 secondary teachers and administrators in my district in Sonoma, California. One of the practices discussed in the book that is an easy one to defend and implement is this idea of redefining the zero.

Many of my experienced colleagues are rethinking their use of the zero because they’ve seen the stark reality of what it takes to overcome a K. I encourage you to think philosophically about what you want your grading practices to encourage and convey to students. Are your grades an accurate reflection of what a student knows? Do your grading practices align with your teaching philosophies? Discussing my grading practices with colleagues was one of the best professional development exercises I have undertaken in 19 years.

PUSHBACK IS COMMON BUT MANAGEABLE

The biggest pushback I have gotten from my colleagues has been related to the reporting of the redefined floor of 50 in the online grade book to parents and guardians. I agree that it’s confusing for a parent to see that an assignment is missing but at the same time the student received a “7/14.” The online grade book exacerbates the issue of “I don’t want to give them something for nothing.”

At my school site, there is no way around this, so we have to clearly communicate the rationale to parents with conversations or grade book comments, which is a good thing. However, this also unveils a bigger issue that can be raised with school administrators: reevaluation of our institutional systems to allow for a reimagined grading scale that is more mathematically sound and accurate.

I encourage you to find some like-minded and also some not-like-minded teachers and/or administrators and try this grading method. It makes you really have to defend your practices or develop new ones that might be contrary to what you experienced as a student.

terça-feira, 20 de julho de 2021

GTTP COURSES ON THE SUMMER OF 2022!

PARTICIPATE IN THE GTTP COURSES ON THE SUMMER OF 2022!

Are you preparing a proposal for Erasmus+ KA1 mobility? Be sure to include our face-to-face Teacher Training Courses on the summer of 2022!

Our courses are open to teachers of all grade levels and all subject domains, who wish to dive into a real STEAM experience (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics) and discover the wonderful world of Astronomy.

JULY 2022

TENERIFE, CANARY ISLANDS, SPAIN

OCTOBER 2022

MADRID,SPAIN

Astronomy Education Adventure in the Canary Islands

This training consists of conferences and hands-on workshops on subjects related to Astronomy, with particular emphasis on Inquiry learning activities, and the use of robotic telescopes for scientific projects that can be pursued in schools. The program includes a half day visit to Teide Observatory, where participants will visit several telescopes and experiments and will attend a night observing session. There will be an optional visit to Roque de los Muchachos Observatory (La Palma).

Discover more

ESA-GTTP

The European Space Agency and the Galileo Teacher Training Program join hands again to bring cutting edge training opportunities to all interested teachers. This time we will have the opportunity to visit the Science Operations Centre of ESA in Madrid (Spain). The program includes presentations by scientists, hands-on activities, digital tools, research activities, visits to the facility and observing sessions with robotic telescopes.

Discover more

Looking for training opportunities this year? Check our online courses for the summer of 2021!

SEARCH OUR ONLINE COURSES

The GTTP courses are organized by NUCLIO in the framework of the Galileo Teacher Training Program. You can contact us anytime to: info@galileoteachers.org.

GHOU 2021

GHOU 2021 online conference - Participate and Submit your abstract until the 30th of July

NUCLIO

Join us Online from August 23 to 27

After a successful online edition in 2020, GHOU Conference is back this August! Become part of a global network of Astronomers, Scientists and Educators with one common goal: to bring Science Education to a whole new level.

WHAT IS GLOBAL HANDS ON UNIVERSE?

The Global Hands-On-Universe Conference gathers Astronomers, Educators and Scientists from several fields of knowledge to exchange ideas for hands-on science education. Among the highlights of these practices you’ll find using real-time remote telescopes, real science experiments in the classroom, and development of fundamental scientific skills in teachers and students. The mission is to promote interaction between different countries, and engage teachers and students in a global science education cooperation where inclusion and equality are key.

WHAT IS SPECIAL IN GHOU?

We see a world with no borders...the same home for all

PROGRAMME

(the full programme will be published after abstract submission closes)

From the 23th to the 27th of August you will have access to the following Key activities

INVITED

TALKS

ORAL

PRESENTATIONS

ONLINE

WORLSHOPS

ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSIONS

Discover the full programme and the conference topics on the conference website

CONFERENCE WEBSITE

REGISTRATIONS AND ABSTRACT SUBMISSION

Submit an abstract for an oral presentation or workshop, or register as participant only. Registration is free for everyone thanks to support from the Royal Astronomical Society.

The deadline for abstract submission is the 31st of July